DOMOSO�
Rx
Fort Dodge
DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE
Gel
90% Dimethyl Sulfoxide - Medical Grade
For Animal Use Only
NADA 47-925, Approved by FDA
CAUTION
Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on
the order of a licensed veterinarian.
GENERAL
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), an oxidation product
of dimethyl sulfide, is an exceptional solvent possessing a number of commercial
uses.
It freely mixes with water with the evolution
of heat and lowers the freezing point of aqueous solutions. It is soluble in
many other compounds including ethanol, acetone, diethyl ether, glycerin,
toluene, benzene and chloroform. DMSO is a solvent for many aromatic and
unsaturated hydrocarbons as well as inorganic salts and nitrogen-containing
compounds. DMSO has a high dielectric constant due to the polarity of the
sulphur-oxygen bond. Its basicity is slightly greater than water due to enhanced
electron density at the oxygen atom. It forms crystalline salts with strong
protic acids and coordinates with Lewis acids. It modifies hydrogen bonding.
DMSO is a hygroscopic stable organic liquid
essentially odorless and water white in color. Other physical characteristics
include:
Molecular weight |
78.13 |
Melting point |
18.45�C |
Boiling point |
189�C |
DOMOSO Gel contains 90% dimethyl sulfoxide,
carbomer 934, disodium edetate, NaOH and purified water q.s.
PHARMACOLOGY
The original biological applications of DMSO
were primarily confined to its use in preserving various tissues and cellular
elements including blood (1), blood cells and bone marrow (2), leukocytes (3),
lymphocytes (4), platelets (5), spermatozoa (6, 7, 8), corneal grafts (9, 10),
skin (11), tissue culture cells (12, 13, 14, 15) and trypanosomes (16), by
freezing techniques. DMSO has also been investigated as a radioprotective agent
(17, 18).
DMSO has been stated to increase the
penetration of low molecular weight allergens such as penicillin G but not large
molecular weight allergens such as house dust (19).
The rate of passage of tritiated water in the
presence of DMSO on the epidermis of the hairless mouse was measured in
vitro. DMSO did not appear to promote the passage of water by its presence,
but when concentrated solutions (60% to 100%) were used, permanent changes were
produced in the rate of passage of water. It was concluded that the
concentration of DMSO used seemed more significant than the time of exposure in
establishing the effect on the water barrier (20).
When the tails of mice were immersed in a 5%
solution of various psychoactive drugs in DMSO, the drugs appeared to exert
their usual pharmacological effects, indicating drug penetration as judged by
the behavioral effects observed in the experimental subjects. Other solvents,
including water, also appeared to permit some drug penetration in this study
(21).
Using ten quaternary ammonium salts as test
compounds and either water or DMSO as solvents, the oral LD50 values
were determined in rats and mice. Toxicity changes were obtained in some
instances by 50% DMSO and more changes were observed in rats than mice although
the results in the two species were not always parallel. When toxicity was
altered by DMSO it increased in all instances except one (22).
When administered systemically in another
study, however, various drugs dissolved in DMSO did not differ significantly in
their lethality or cellular penetration as compared to the same drugs
administered in saline (23).
When evaluated as a solvent for biologic
screening tests, low doses of hormones in DMSO stimulated a response similar to
that of the hormone in the control vehicle. Higher doses of hormone, however,
failed to give the expected response suggesting a partition coefficient in favor
of the solvent (24). DMSO was also shown to carry physostigmine and
phenylbutazone through the skin of the rat (25).
The absorption of phenylbutazone dissolved in
an aqueous solution of DMSO was impaired when administered orally to the rabbit.
Absorption of the same drug was not improved using the subcutaneous route
simultaneously with DMSO.
However, phenylbutazone could be detected in
the rabbit's blood for several hours when an ointment containing DMSO and 5%
phenylbutazone was applied to the skin. When the DMSO content of the ointment
was increased, the phenylbutazone levels increased. An increase of
phenylbutazone in the muscle tissues underlying the site of application over a
control ointment containing phenylbutazone without DMSO could be demonstrated in
rats (26).
In a number of other studies in experimental
animals (21, 25, 27) where DMSO has been chiefly administered orally or by
injection, no anti-inflammatory or analgesic activity could be established.
Following experimental hypersensitization to
human gamma globulin in the horse, antigen challenge resulted in massive
erythema, necrosis and slough. This reaction could be markedly reduced by the
hourly application of undiluted DMSO to the reaction site, after challenge (19).
DMSO, by itself, at concentrations of 100%, 66%
and 33% has been shown to produce neurolysis following perineural injection in
the rat's sciatic nerve (28).
The conflicting reports cited above for the
anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of DMSO are partially dependent upon
the experimental models and methods used to measure these parameters. DMSO fails
to show analgesic or anti-inflammatory activity in certain of these situations,
particularly when used by the systemic route or when administered topically
preceded by an irritant substance. In clinical studies in the horse, it was
noted that when iodine, liniments or other strong irritants were present on the
skin from previous therapy and DMSO applied, a temporary but marked local
reaction would occur. This was due to the ability of DMSO to carry these
substances into the underlying skin tissues where their irritant actions could
be displayed.
Using the isolated guinea pig heart it was
found that DMSO did not influence the amplitude of cardiac contractions, heart
rate or coronary flow, although high intravenous doses in the rat and cat
resulted in a transient lowering of blood pressure (25).
Isolated, innervated guinea pig preparations
were also used to study the effects of DMSO on skeletal, smooth and cardiac
muscles. The compound depressed diaphragm response to both muscle and nerve
stimulation and also caused spontaneous skeletal muscle fasciculations. Actual
contraction amplitude was augmented although contraction rate appeared
unaffected. Vagal threshold was lowered almost 50% by a bath concentration of 6%
DMSO. The fasciculations and increased tone of skeletal muscle, and lowering of
the vagal threshold by DMSO could be due to cholinesterase inhibition (29). The
in vitro oxygen consumption of liver, brain and hemidiaphragm tissues of
rats is not affected by the intravenous administration of 75 mg DMSO/100 g body
weight during the 7 subsequent days.
Urease, trypsin and chymotrypsin are inhibited
by DMSO dependent upon its concentration. The in vitro metabolism of
corticosterone by rat liver slices is not affected by the intravenous
administration of 100 mg DMSO/100 g body weight during 3 subsequent days (30).
DMSO treatment administered intraperitoneally
to rats for 35 days decreased experimentally induced intestinal adhesions by 80%
over controls as compared to saline, cortisone acetate or a combination of
cortisone and DMSO administered separately (31).
In rabbits the application of 70% DMSO,
adjacent to but not on the wound incision site, appeared to increase the
development of wound tensile strength over controls (32).
Increasing the concentration of DMSO resulted
in an increasing inhibition of fibroblast proliferation, in vitro, which
was reversible (19).
TOXICOLOGY
In a study designed to evaluate the effects of
DOMOSO� (dimethyl sulfoxide) Solution at a total daily dose of
100-300 mL administered for a total period of 90 days, no essential or
clinically meaningful ophthalmological effects were seen in the horse. There
were no significant variations in glucose, sodium, potassium, SGOT or SGPT
measurements. There were a few fluctuations in hematologic values but no changes
appear to be drug-related or of significance.
Another study was conducted in the dog to
determine the effects of DOMOSO Solution at a total daily dose of 20-60 mL
administered topically for 21 consecutive days. No clinically meaningful
ophthalmological effects were noted. No significant variations were observed in
blood measurements, including glucose, BUN, SGOT and plasma electrophoresis.
Hematologic values were similar to control animals used in this study.
Long-term topical applications of the drug to
guinea pigs resulted in histopathologic changes similar to those observed in
allergic contact dermatitis. The observed clinical changes were compatible with
either an allergic contact dermatitis or a primary irritant effect (33). DMSO
was shown to cause erythema and blistering of human and rat skin resulting in
increased permeability of venules and capillaries (34).
In most cases the local irritation of the skin
characterized by erythema, vesicle or blister formation and scurfing abates even
with continued treatment. The phenomenon has been described as �accommodation�
or �hardening� of the skin, and has been noted with other solvents.
The undiluted compound has low systemic
toxicity but a marked local necrotizing and inflammatory effect when it is
injected subcutaneously. In rats the subcutaneous injection of 10 g/kg or the
intravenous injection of 2.5 g/kg of undiluted DMSO for 2 weeks showed no
definite indication of systemic toxicity. The local necrotizing effects produced
at these dose levels, however, prevented a longer period of treatment. No
significant hematologic or biochemical changes were noted in 3 dogs receiving
0.4 g/kg for 33 days (24).
Four dogs were administered topical DMSO at 1
g/kg body weight, 5 days weekly for 18 months. Serum glutamic oxaloacetic
transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), prothrombin
time, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, total protein and albumin globulin (AG)
ratio, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were determined at the beginning of
treatment and at monthly intervals. Significant abnormalities did not occur
(41).
Upon injection of DMSO into the rat pleura,
there is an accumulation of fluid, initially appearing as a transudate, but
later as a protein-rich exudate. Exudate formation is thought to be due to
increased vascular permeability, predominantly in venules, brought about by a
delayed release of histamine together with activation of a vaso-active slow
contracting substance (34).
A compilation of the results for a number of
acute toxicity (LD50) determinations derived from several published
reports(24, 40, 42, 43, 44) in several experimental animal species are as
follows:
Species |
Rt. of Administr. |
LD50 g/kg |
Mouse |
- |
SQ |
- |
13.9-20.5 |
Mouse |
- |
IV |
- |
3.82-10.73 |
Mouse |
- |
Oral |
- |
15.0-22 |
Mouse |
- |
IP |
- |
20.06 |
Rat |
- |
IV |
- |
5.25-5.36 |
Rat |
- |
Oral |
- |
16.0-28.3 |
Rat |
- |
IP |
- |
6.5-13.621 |
Dog |
- |
IV |
- |
2.5 |
Guinea Pig |
- |
IP |
- |
6.5 |
Chicken |
- |
Oral |
- |
12.5 |
Hemolysis resulting in hemoglobinuria and
methemoglobinuria was noted in anesthetized cats following single intravenous
doses of 200 mg/kg DMSO. The intraperitoneal administration of DMSO or the
dilution of DMSO with isotonic saline prior to intravenous administration
reduced its hemolytic activity (39).
Tests in vitro showed that washed rabbit
erythrocytes are hemolyzed in a short time with 40% to 60% DMSO solution. Higher
concentrations caused, without hemolysis, an agglutination of the erythrocytes
(40).
Teratology
The intraperitoneal administration of 5.5 g/kg
of DMSO as a single dose to pregnant hamsters induced developmental
malformations of their embryos (35). Both dimethyl sulfoxide and diethyl
sulfoxide are teratogenic when injected into the chick embryo, the
classification of malformations being dependent upon the stage of embryonic
development at the time of treatment. The same drugs when administered by
various techniques to mice, rats and rabbits in which fertility had been
established, did not cause any embryonic malformations (36).
Ocular Effects
In a variety of experimental animals including
rats, dogs, swine, rabbits and primates, following oral or topical
administration of DMSO, certain eye changes have been noted. These consist
mainly of a change in the refractive index of the lens described as a �lens
within a lens�. The lens changes are characterized by a decrease in the normal
relucency of the lens cortex, causing the normal central zone of the lens to act
as a biconvex lens. When viewing the fundus of affected animals, it is necessary
to interpose biconcave lenses in order to see the retinal vessels clearly. The
functional effect would be a tendency toward myopia (37).
The lens changes were first observed in dogs
receiving 5 g DMSO/kg after 9 weeks of administration. At lower dose levels the
change was observed later. In rabbits these changes were seen after 90 days of
dermal application, (8 mg 50% DMSO/kg/day and 4 mg 100% DMSO/kg/day and higher).
In swine, dermal application of 4.5 g 90% DMSO/kg twice daily caused similar
lens changes by 90 days of treatment (38).
The lens changes appear earlier with oral
administration, and also bear a relation to the dosage employed; the higher the
dose the more rapid their appearance.
The eye changes are slowly reversible but with
a definite species difference, the dog being the slowest to exhibit improvement.
No effects were seen following direct
application of aqueous solutions varying from 10% to full strength into the eyes
of albino rabbits for a total dosage of DMSO between 0.1 and 0.2 g/kg body
weight per day for six months. Rabbits which received daily doses as high as
10 g/kg orally or topically showed lines of discontinuity in their lenses. No
cataract was seen after ten weeks of such daily treatment, although
discontinuous lens lines could be detected in about two weeks by slit lamp
examination. Chemical studies on these lenses revealed reduction in the usual
concentrations of urea, glutathione, uric and amino acids (19).
INDICATIONS
Canine and Equine
DOMOSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) Gel is recommended
as a topical application to reduce acute swelling due to trauma.
ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE
DOMOSO Gel is to be administered topically to
the skin over the affected area.
Dogs - Liberal application should be
administered three to four times daily. Total daily dosage should not exceed 20
g. Total duration of therapy should not exceed 14 days.
Horses - Liberal application should be
administered two to three times daily. Total daily dosage should not exceed 100
g. Total duration of therapy should not exceed 30 days.
SIDE EFFECTS
In general, adverse reactions are local, and
while they may prove to be annoying to some patients, they are usually not of a
serious nature. Upon topical application, an occasionally animal may develop
transient erythema, associated with local �burning� or �smarting�. Even when
erythema or vesiculation occur, they are self-limiting reversible states, and
not necessarily an indication to discontinue medication. Dryness of the skin and
an oyster-like breath odor have been reported. These effects are temporary and
are not considered to be of serious consequence. Changes in the refractive index
of the lens of the eye and nuclear cataracts have been observed in animals, with
the use of this drug. This appears to be related to dosage and duration of
therapy.
PRECAUTION AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
Contact between DOMOSO Gel and the skin should
be avoided. Rubber gloves should be worn while applying this drug. Forceps and
swabs may be used to facilitate application. If absorbed through the skin,
DOMOSO Gel will cause odorous breath and unpleasant mouth taste. Mild sedation
or drowsiness, sensations of warmth, burning, irritation, itching and mild
erythematous localized or generalized dermatitis have been reported in some
persons following exposure to DOMOSO Gel. Treatment of such side effects is
symptomatic. Consult a physician immediately if adverse effects appear.
DOMOSO Gel may mask certain disease signs such
as seen in fractures, etc.; this does not obviate the need for specific therapy
in such conditions.
Since DOMOSO Gel effectively alters the
biologic membrane, it will in some cases facilitate the systemic absorption of
other topically applied drugs and may have a potentiating effect on drugs
administered systemically.
DOMOSO Gel should be judiciously used when
administered in conjunction with other pharmaceutical preparations, especially
those affecting the cardiovascular and central nervous systems.
DOMOSO Gel may enhance the absorption of other
materials into the skin. The veterinarian should make certain that other
medications are not present prior to its application.
Keep DOMOSO Gel out of the reach of children.
DOMOSO Gel is recommended for topical
application only. DO NOT ADMINISTER BY ANY OTHER ROUTE.
DOMOSO Gel should not be used under occlusive
dressings.
DOMOSO Gel is contraindicated in horses and
dogs intended for breeding purposes.
DOMOSO Gel is a potent solvent and may have a
deleterious effect on fabrics, plastics and other materials. Care should be
taken to prevent physical contact with DOMOSO Gel.
DOMOSO Gel should not be administered to horses
that are to be slaughtered for food.
CAUTION: HYGROSCOPIC. CLOSE CAP TIGHTLY AFTER
USE. AVOID FREEZING. DUE TO THE RAPID PENETRATION ABILITY OF DOMOSO GEL, RUBBER
GLOVES SHOULD BE WORN WHEN APPLYING THIS DRUG.
HOW SUPPLIED
DOMOSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) Gel is supplied in
2.1 Oz (60 g) and 4.2 Oz (120 g) collapsible tubes, and 15 Oz (425 g)
containers.
NDC 0856-0046-50 - 2.1 Oz (60 g) - tube
NDC 0856-0046-51 - 4.2 Oz (120 g) - tube
NDC 0856-0046-55 - 15 Oz (425 g) - container
Store at controlled room temperature 15� to
30�C (59� to 86�F).
Rx Medication Sold Only To Licensed Veterinarians & Pharmacies. Current License Must Be On File Prior To Shipping.